Day By Day

Wednesday, March 07, 2012

A simple question

Michael Ramirez of Investors Business Daily has it nailed:

John Hinderaker of Powerline adds his own take:
My own interpretation of this cartoon is broader than Ramirez perhaps intended. It is not just forcing religious institutions to pay for contraception, etc., that is unconstitutional under the First Amendment. Rather, for the federal government to dictate any coverages that must be included in private insurance policies is well beyond any enumerated power in the Constitution, and therefore is invalid.
I think that John and Michael are actually on the same wavelength.

No comments: